PSR Sets £85k Faster Payments Scam Refund Rules

The Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) has confirmed that, from 7 October 2026, victims of Authorised Push Payment (APP) fraud will be entitled to reimbursement up to £85,000 per transaction. This new cap applies to all payments made through the Faster Payments system and is aligned with the Bank of England’s recently set reimbursement limit for the CHAPS scheme. The measure is designed to provide robust protection for consumers affected by payment scams, with the PSR estimating that over 99% of compensation claims will fall within this maximum threshold. [Source: PSR]

Authorised Push Payment (APP) fraud

The new reimbursement scheme introduces a shared cost model, requiring both sending and receiving payment service providers (PSPs) to contribute equally to the cost of reimbursing fraud victims. This approach is expected to create stronger incentives for all parties to implement effective fraud prevention measures. By aligning reimbursement limits across Faster Payments and CHAPS, the policy also aims to reduce complexity for consumers and support clarity within the sector.

Key FactsDetails
Reimbursement LimitUp to £85,000 per APP scam case
Effective Date7 October 2026
CoverageOver 99% of claims covered

A final, detailed policy statement from the PSR will be published next week outlining the rationale behind the decision. The Bank of England has committed to reviewing the £85,000 CHAPS cap within twelve months to ensure it remains appropriate, which may lead to future adjustments as the payment landscape evolves.

About Charlie Davids

Charlie Davies has over 15 years of experience in the online gambling space. Starting out as a poker player, he gradually moved into writing to help players better understand casinos, apps, and payment methods. Today, Charlie focuses on mobile-first gambling, with a passion for making complex topics simple and trustworthy. Whether it's withdrawal speeds or casino reviews, he brings clarity from a player’s perspective.
Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.